| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | Leads this displayed comparison. Source notesSource cell: 0.602 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #2 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 2 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.582 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #3 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 3.4 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.568 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #4 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 6.3 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.539 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #4 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 6.3 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.539 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #6 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 6.8 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.534 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #7 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 9.1 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.511 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #8 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 9.6 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.506 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #9 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 10.6 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.496 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #10 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 10.8 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.494 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #11 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 11.3 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.489 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #12 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 11.6 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.486 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #13 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 11.8 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.484 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #14 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 12.7 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.475 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Base LLMs | #15 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 13.6 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.466 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #16 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 13.7 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.465 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Base LLMs | #17 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 14.6 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.456 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Base LLMs | #18 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 14.7 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.455 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Base LLMs | #19 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 15.9 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.443 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #20 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 16.4 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.438 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #21 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 16.5 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.437 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #21 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 16.5 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.437 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Base LLMs | #23 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 16.9 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.433 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #23 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 16.9 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.433 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #25 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 17 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.432 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #25 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 17 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.432 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #27 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 18 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.422 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #28 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 18.1 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.421 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Base LLMs | #29 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 18.4 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.418 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #30 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 19.2 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.410 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #31 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 19.5 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.407 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Base LLMs | #32 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 20.2 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.400 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #33 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 20.4 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.398 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #34 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 21 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.392 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #35 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 21.2 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.390 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Base LLMs | #36 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 21.7 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.385 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #37 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 21.9 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.383 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Base LLMs | #37 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 21.9 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.383 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #39 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 22.3 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.379 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Base LLMs | #40 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 22.9 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.373 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Base LLMs | #41 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 23.1 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.371 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #42 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 23.4 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.368 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Base LLMs | #43 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 24.6 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.356 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Base LLMs | #44 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 24.7 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.355 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #45 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 25.1 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.351 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #46 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 26.4 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.338 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Base LLMs | #47 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 28.2 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.320 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #48 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 28.7 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.315 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #49 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 30.5 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.297 |
|---|
| 1 report | BigCodeBench & BigCodeBench-Hard · BigCodeBench Complete · greedy accuracy[1]Original BigCodeBench · Complete · Instruction-tuned LLMs | #50 of 60 in this displayed comparison; 30.9 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0.293 |
|---|