| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | Leads this displayed comparison. Source notesSource cell: 66.9 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #2 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 1.5 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 65.4 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #3 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 2.4 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 64.5 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #4 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 2.6 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 64.3 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #4 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 2.6 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 64.3 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #6 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 4.4 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 62.5 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #7 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 6.3 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 60.6 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #8 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 6.5 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 60.4 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #9 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 6.9 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 60.0 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #10 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 7.2 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 59.7 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #11 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 7.8 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 59.1 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #12 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 8.5 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 58.4 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #13 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 10.6 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 56.3 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #14 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 12.2 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 54.7 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #15 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 12.4 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 54.5 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #15 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 12.4 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 54.5 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #17 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 12.9 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 54.0 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #17 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 12.9 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 54.0 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #19 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 13.5 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 53.4 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #19 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 13.5 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 53.4 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #21 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 14.5 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 52.4 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #22 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 14.8 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 52.1 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #23 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 15.3 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 51.6 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #24 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 16.2 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 50.7 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #25 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 16.4 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 50.5 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #26 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 16.5 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 50.4 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #27 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 17.3 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 49.6 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #28 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 17.6 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 49.3 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #29 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 18.6 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 48.3 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #30 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 19 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 47.9 |
|---|
| 1 report | MMT-Bench & MuirBench · MMT-Bench accuracy[1]MMT-Bench · primary leaderboard | #30 of 31 in this displayed comparison; 19 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 47.9 |
|---|