| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | Leads this displayed comparison. Source notesSource cell: 43 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #2 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 16 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 27 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #3 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 19 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 24 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #4 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 21 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 22 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #5 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 29 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 14 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #6 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 31 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 12 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #7 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 32 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 11 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #8 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 33 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 10 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #9 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 34 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 9 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #9 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 34 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 9 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #11 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 36 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 7 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #11 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 36 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 7 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #11 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 36 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 7 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #11 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 36 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 7 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #15 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 37 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 6 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #15 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 37 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 6 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #15 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 37 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 6 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #18 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 40 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 3 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #19 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 41 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 2 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #19 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 41 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 2 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Functional variation · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #21 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 43 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 0 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | Leads this displayed comparison. Source notesSource cell: 51 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #2 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 18 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 33 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #3 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 21 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 30 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #4 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 23 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 28 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #5 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 28 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 23 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #6 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 32 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 19 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #7 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 33 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 18 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #8 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 35 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 16 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #9 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 39 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 12 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #9 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 39 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 12 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #11 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 40 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 11 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #11 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 40 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 11 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #13 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 41 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 10 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #13 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 41 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 10 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #15 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 42 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 9 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #16 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 43 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 8 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #17 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 44 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 7 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #17 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 44 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 7 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #19 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 45 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 6 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #20 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 46 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 5 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Matched original subset · accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · five-trial robustness comparison | #21 of 21 in this displayed comparison; 49 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 2 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Original · problem accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · original questions | Leads this displayed comparison. Source notesSource cell: 41.94 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Original · problem accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · original questions | #2 of 18 in this displayed comparison; 22.59 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 19.35 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Original · problem accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · original questions | #3 of 18 in this displayed comparison; 25.98 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 15.96 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Original · problem accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · original questions | #4 of 18 in this displayed comparison; 30.45 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 11.49 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Original · problem accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · original questions | #5 of 18 in this displayed comparison; 30.64 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 11.30 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Original · problem accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · original questions | #6 of 18 in this displayed comparison; 31.6 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 10.34 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Original · problem accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · original questions | #7 of 18 in this displayed comparison; 32.37 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 9.57 |
|---|
| 1 report | Putnam-AXIOM · Original · problem accuracy[1]Putnam-AXIOM · original questions | #8 of 18 in this displayed comparison; 33.32 pp below the leader. Source notesSource cell: 8.62 |
|---|