RLTasksby ulam.ai
Models / Reported model

Reported model / MODEL EVIDENCE

Chinese-Alpaca-13B

1 benchmarks · 2 observations · 1 sources

Scores at a glance

1 benchmarks · large dot: Chinese-Alpaca-13B; small dots: closest models where reported

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

10.0 percentile-point gap

1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons

30.0 percentile-point gap

1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons

How similarity is measured

Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.

Filter comparisons to this model →

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. C-Eval: A Multi-Level Multi-Discipline Chinese Evaluation Suite for Foundation Models — published result table ↗

    Yuzhen Huang, Yuzhuo Bai, Zhihao Zhu, Junlei Zhang, Jinghan Zhang, Tangjun Su et al. · 2023

    All 13 authors

    Yuzhen Huang, Yuzhuo Bai, Zhihao Zhu, Junlei Zhang, Jinghan Zhang, Tangjun Su, Junteng Liu, Chuancheng Lv, Yikai Zhang, Jiayi Lei, Yao Fu, Maosong Sun, Junxian He

Names used in source tables

Chinese Alpaca-13B · Chinese-Alpaca-13B