Claude-2.0 · HarmBench · HarmBench harmful compliance · SORRY-Bench paper · cross-benchmark comparison ↗
Anthropic / MODEL EVIDENCE
Claude-2.0
1 benchmarks · 1 observations · 1 sources
Scores at a glance
1 benchmarks · large dot: Claude-2.0; small dots: closest models where reported
Closest models by score
Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.
Claude-2.1 →Anthropic
1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
How similarity is measured
Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.
Sources
Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.
- SORRY-Bench: Systematically Evaluating Large Language Model Safety Refusal — published result table ↗
All 16 authors
Tinghao Xie, Xiangyu Qi, Yi Zeng, Yangsibo Huang, Udari Madhushani Sehwag, Kaixuan Huang, Luxi He, Boyi Wei, Dacheng Li, Ying Sheng, Ruoxi Jia, Bo Li, Kai Li, Danqi Chen, Peter Henderson, Prateek Mittal
Names used in source tables
Claude-2.0