Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · GPQA diamond · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
Anthropic / MODEL EVIDENCE
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024)
22 benchmarks · 23 observations · 22 sources · released 2024-10-22
Scores at a glance
22 benchmarks · large dot: Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024); small dots: closest models where reported
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · FrontierMath-2025-02-28-Private · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · FrontierMath-Tier-4-2025-07-01-Private · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · MATH level 5 · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · Aider coding benchmarks · Polyglot · percent correct ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · Balrog · Average progress · % ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · CadEval · Overall pass (%) · % ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · GeoBench · ACW Country % · % ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · GSO-Bench · Score OPT@1 · % ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · Lech Mazur Writing · Mean rubric score / 10 ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · MMLU · EM · % ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · SimpleBench · Score (AVG@5) · % ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · The Agent Company · % Resolved · % ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · VPCT · Correct · % ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · WeirdML · Accuracy · % ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · HLE · Accuracy · % ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · METR task performance & time horizons · Average task accuracy ↗
1 more reported result
20.52287 minutes · Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · METR task performance & time horizons · 50% success task horizon · METR-Horizon-v1.1 · Epoch AI · METR Autonomy / Task-Horizon Suite · public result data ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · DTBench · Accuracy · % ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · LiveBench · Global average · % ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · VideoMME · Overall (no subtitles) · % ↗
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024) · EnigmaEval · Accuracy · % ↗
Closest models by score
Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.
3 of 5 shared benchmark comparisons
3 of 5 shared benchmark comparisons
4 of 5 shared benchmark comparisons
How similarity is measured
Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.
Sources
Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.
- Aider LLM Leaderboards — Polyglot coding benchmark ↗
- BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Games ↗
All 13 authors
Paglieri, Davide, Cupiał, Bartłomiej, Coward, Samuel, Piterbarg, Ulyana, Wolczyk, Maciej, Khan, Akbir, Pignatelli, Eduardo, Kuciński, Łukasz, Pinto, Lerrel, Fergus, Rob, Foerster, Jakob Nicolaus, Parker-Holder, Jack, Rocktäschel, Tim
- DTBench — Conceptual Reasoning Index ↗
- Holistic Evaluation of Language Models (HELM) ↗
- FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1, old) ↗
- FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v1, old) ↗
- GPQA Diamond ↗
- Humanity's Last Exam ↗
- MATH Level 5 ↗
- OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 ↗
- SimpleBench ↗
- The Agent Company ↗
- Capabilities & benchmarking — retained external evaluation records ↗
- Video-MME ↗
- GeoBench — GeoGuessr model benchmark ↗
- Writing benchmark — incorporating mandatory story elements ↗
- GSO: Challenging Software Optimization Tasks for Evaluating SWE-Agents ↗
- WeirdML ↗
- EnigmaEval ↗
- LiveBench — model evaluation leaderboard ↗
- Measuring AI Ability to Complete Long Software Tasks ↗
- CadEval Dashboard — run 20250422_095709 ↗
Names used in source tables
Claude 3.5 Sonnet (Oct 2024)