Claude 4.5 Opus · MMLU-Pro · Qwen report ↗
Anthropic / MODEL EVIDENCE
Claude 4.5 Opus
27 benchmarks · 29 observations · 2 sources
Scores at a glance
27 benchmarks · large dot: Claude 4.5 Opus; small dots: closest models where reported
Claude 4.5 Opus · IFEval · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · IFBench · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · AA-LCR · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · LongBench v2 · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · HLE · no tools · Qwen report ↗
1 more reported result
43.4 · Claude 4.5 Opus · HLE w/ tool · Qwen report · Qwen3.5 technical model card · language ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · LiveCodeBench v6 · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · IMOAnswerBench · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · AIME26 · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · BFCL-V4 · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · MCP-Mark · original release · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · WideSearch · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · SWE-bench Verified · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · SWE-bench Multilingual · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · Terminal Bench 2 · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · MMMU · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · MMMU-Pro · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · MathVision · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · Mathvista(mini) · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · ZEROBench · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · CharXiv(RQ) · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · OCRBench · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · VideoMME(w sub.) · Qwen report ↗
1 more reported result
81.4 · Claude 4.5 Opus · VideoMME(w/o sub.) · Qwen report · Qwen3.5 technical model card · vision ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · LVBench · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · ScreenSpot Pro · Qwen report ↗
Claude 4.5 Opus · OSWorld-Verified · Qwen report ↗
claude-4.5-opus · Average contest performance ↗
Closest models by score
Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.
25 of 27 shared benchmark comparisons
25 of 27 shared benchmark comparisons
26 of 27 shared benchmark comparisons
How similarity is measured
Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.
Reports featuring this model
Sources
Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.
Names used in source tables
Claude 4.5 Opus · claude-4.5-opus