RLTasksby ulam.ai
Models / Anthropic

Anthropic / MODEL EVIDENCE

Claude Computer Use 3.7

1 benchmarks · 1 observations · 1 sources

Scores at a glance

1 benchmarks · large dot: Claude Computer Use 3.7; small dots: closest models where reported

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

20.0 percentile-point gap

1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons

40.0 percentile-point gap

1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons

How similarity is measured

Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.

Filter comparisons to this model →

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. An Illusion of Progress? Assessing the Current State of Web Agents — published result table ↗

    Xue, Tianci, Qi, Weijian, Shi, Tianneng, Song, Chan Hee, Gou, Boyu, Song, Dawn et al. · 2025

    All 8 authors

    Xue, Tianci, Qi, Weijian, Shi, Tianneng, Song, Chan Hee, Gou, Boyu, Song, Dawn, Sun, Huan, Su, Yu

Names used in source tables

Claude Computer Use 3.7