Google / MODEL EVIDENCE

Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025)

6 benchmarks · 6 observations · 6 sources · released 2025-02-05

Scores at a glance

6 benchmarks · large dot: Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025); small dots: closest models where reported

9.2896.4

Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) · GPQA diamond · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗

3.2998.13

Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) · MATH level 5 · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗

22.0882.35

Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) · LiveBench · Global average · % ↗

0.3839.28

Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025) · EnigmaEval · Accuracy · % ↗

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

3.3 percentile-point gap

4 of 6 shared benchmark comparisons

How similarity is measured

Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. Aider LLM Leaderboards — Polyglot coding benchmark ↗

    Aider

  2. GPQA Diamond ↗

    Epoch AI

  3. MATH Level 5 ↗

    Epoch AI

  4. Fiction.liveBench — March 14, 2025 benchmark release ↗

    Fiction.live · 2025

  5. EnigmaEval ↗

    Scale Labs / SEAL

  6. LiveBench — model evaluation leaderboard ↗

    LiveBench Team

Names used in source tables

Gemini 2.0 Pro Exp (Feb 2025)