Google / MODEL EVIDENCE

Gemini-Pro-Vision

2 benchmarks · 4 observations · 1 sources

Scores at a glance

2 benchmarks · large dot: Gemini-Pro-Vision; small dots: closest models where reported

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

16.7 percentile-point gap

2 of 2 shared benchmark comparisons

33.3 percentile-point gap

2 of 2 shared benchmark comparisons

How similarity is measured

Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems — published result table ↗

    Chaoqun He, Renjie Luo, Yuzhuo Bai, Shengding Hu, Zhen Leng Thai, Junhao Shen et al. · 2024

    All 14 authors

    Chaoqun He, Renjie Luo, Yuzhuo Bai, Shengding Hu, Zhen Leng Thai, Junhao Shen, Jinyi Hu, Xu Han, Yujie Huang, Yuxiang Zhang, Jie Liu, Lei Qi, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun

Names used in source tables

Gemini-Pro-Vision