GLM 4.7 · GPQA Diamond · Accuracy ↗
1 more reported result
83.33% · GLM-4.7 · GPQA diamond · Best score (across scorers) · % · Epoch AI · GPQA diamond ↗
Z.ai / MODEL EVIDENCE
26 benchmarks · 28 observations · 27 sources · released 2025-12-22
26 benchmarks · large dot: GLM-4.7; small dots: closest models where reported
GLM 4.7 · GPQA Diamond · Accuracy ↗
83.33% · GLM-4.7 · GPQA diamond · Best score (across scorers) · % · Epoch AI · GPQA diamond ↗
GLM-4.7 · OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
GLM-4.7 · SimpleQA Verified · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
GLM-4.7 · Chess Puzzles · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
GLM-4.7 · SimpleBench · Score (AVG@5) · % ↗
GLM-4.7 · Terminal Bench · Accuracy mean · % ↗
33.26% · GLM-4.7 · Terminal Bench · Accuracy mean · % · Epoch AI · Terminal Bench ↗
GLM-4.7 · CritPt · Accuracy · % ↗
GLM-4.7 · ProofBench · Accuracy · % ↗
GLM-4.7 · SciCode · Score · % ↗
GLM-4.7 · WebDev Arena · Elo ↗
GLM-4.7 · General ECI · 26 October 2026 fit ↗
GLM 4.7 · LegalBench · Accuracy ↗
GLM 4.7 · CaseLaw · Accuracy ↗
GLM 4.7 · CorpFin · Accuracy ↗
GLM 4.7 · TaxEval · Accuracy ↗
GLM 4.7 · MedCode · Accuracy ↗
GLM 4.7 · MedScribe · Accuracy ↗
GLM 4.7 · MedQA · Accuracy ↗
GLM 4.7 · AIME · Accuracy ↗
GLM 4.7 · MGSM · Accuracy ↗
GLM 4.7 · MMLU Pro · Accuracy ↗
GLM 4.7 (Mini-SWE-agent) · SWE-bench Verified · Score ↗
GLM 4.7 · LiveCodeBench · Accuracy ↗
GLM-4.7 · NYU CTF Bench · Cotool 81-challenge subset · accuracy ↗
glm-4.7 · Average contest performance ↗
GLM-4.7 · End-of-year balance ↗
Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.
10 of 16 shared benchmark comparisons
11 of 16 shared benchmark comparisons
10 of 16 shared benchmark comparisons
Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.
Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.
GLM 4.7 · GLM 4.7 (Mini-SWE-agent) · GLM-4.7 · glm-4.7