OmniDocBench ↗95.22 points
GLM-OCR · OmniDocBench · Overall parsing score · end-to-end evaluation ↗
Z.ai / MODEL EVIDENCE
GLM-OCR
1 benchmarks · 1 observations · 1 sources
Scores at a glance
1 benchmarks · large dot: GLM-OCR; small dots: closest models where reported
Closest models by score
Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.
1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
How similarity is measured
Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.
Sources
Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.
- OmniDocBench: Benchmarking Diverse PDF Document Parsing with Comprehensive Annotations — published result table ↗
All 20 authors
Linke Ouyang, Yuan Qu, Hongbin Zhou, Jiawei Zhu, Rui Zhang, Qunshu Lin, Bin Wang, Zhiyuan Zhao, Man Jiang, Xiaomeng Zhao, Jin Shi, Fan Wu, Pei Chu, Minghao Liu, Zhenxiang Li, Chao Xu, Bo Zhang, Botian Shi, Zhongying Tu, Conghui He
Names used in source tables
GLM-OCR