OpenAI / MODEL EVIDENCE

GPT-4o / Plan+Execute

1 benchmarks · 9 observations · 1 sources

Scores at a glance

1 benchmarks · large dot: GPT-4o / Plan+Execute; small dots: closest models where reported

5659

GPT-4o / Plan+Execute · DiscoveryWorld · Average (Easy) · Procedure · GPT-4o agent scaffolds ↗

8 more reported results

18% · GPT-4o / Plan+Execute · DiscoveryWorld · Average (Easy) · Task completion · GPT-4o agent scaffolds · DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents ↗

11% · GPT-4o / Plan+Execute · DiscoveryWorld · Average (Easy) · Explanatory knowledge · GPT-4o agent scaffolds · DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents ↗

64% · GPT-4o / Plan+Execute · DiscoveryWorld · Average (Normal) · Procedure · GPT-4o agent scaffolds · DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents ↗

18% · GPT-4o / Plan+Execute · DiscoveryWorld · Average (Normal) · Task completion · GPT-4o agent scaffolds · DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents ↗

2% · GPT-4o / Plan+Execute · DiscoveryWorld · Average (Normal) · Explanatory knowledge · GPT-4o agent scaffolds · DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents ↗

50% · GPT-4o / Plan+Execute · DiscoveryWorld · Average (Challenge) · Procedure · GPT-4o agent scaffolds · DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents ↗

15% · GPT-4o / Plan+Execute · DiscoveryWorld · Average (Challenge) · Task completion · GPT-4o agent scaffolds · DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents ↗

1% · GPT-4o / Plan+Execute · DiscoveryWorld · Average (Challenge) · Explanatory knowledge · GPT-4o agent scaffolds · DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents ↗

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

How similarity is measured

Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. DISCOVERYWORLD: A Virtual Environment for Developing and Evaluating Automated Scientific Discovery Agents — published result table ↗

    Jansen, Peter, Côté, Marc-Alexandre, Khot, Tushar, Bransom, Erin, Mishra, Bhavana Dalvi, Majumder, Bodhisattwa Prasad et al. · 2024

    All 8 authors

    Jansen, Peter, Côté, Marc-Alexandre, Khot, Tushar, Bransom, Erin, Mishra, Bhavana Dalvi, Majumder, Bodhisattwa Prasad, Tafjord, Oyvind, Clark, Peter

Names used in source tables

GPT-4o / Plan+Execute