GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) · AA-AnalystAgent · strict score ↗
OpenAI / MODEL EVIDENCE
GPT-5.6 Sol
116 benchmarks · 200 observations · 103 sources · released 2026-07-09
Scores at a glance
116 benchmarks · large dot: GPT-5.6 Sol; small dots: closest models where reported
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) · EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) · GPQA Diamond · AA implementation ↗
4 more reported results
93.5% · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · GPQA diamond · Best score (across scorers) · % · Epoch AI · GPQA diamond ↗
89.9% · GPT-5.6 Sol (low) · GPQA diamond · Best score (across scorers) · % · Epoch AI · GPQA diamond ↗
95.2 % · GPT-5.6 Sol · GPQA Diamond · Accuracy · Vals AI · GPQA Diamond ↗
94.6% · GPT-5.6 Sol · GPQA Diamond · GPT-6 Astra launch report ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) · ITBench-AA · root-cause score ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) · MMMU-Pro · AA implementation ↗
1 more reported result
88.84 % · GPT-5.6 Sol · MMMU Pro · Accuracy · Vals AI · MMMU Pro ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) · CritPt v2 · code tools ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) · τ³-Banking ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) · Terminal-Bench 2.1 ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) · CritPt · original ↗
5 more reported results
32.29% · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · CritPt · Accuracy · % · Epoch AI · CritPt ↗
28.57% · GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) · CritPt · Accuracy · % · Epoch AI · CritPt ↗
25.71% · GPT-5.6 Sol (high) · CritPt · Accuracy · % · Epoch AI · CritPt ↗
22.86% · GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) · CritPt · Accuracy · % · Epoch AI · CritPt ↗
14.86% · GPT-5.6 Sol (low) · CritPt · Accuracy · % · Epoch AI · CritPt ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) · Terminal-Bench Hard ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · HLE w/o tools ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (Mini-SWE-agent) · Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Score ↗
3 more reported results
39.9 · GPT-5.6 Sol · Terminal-Bench 4.0 · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 model card ↗
37.3% · GPT-5.6 Sol · Terminal-Bench 4.0 · Claude Opus 5.5 launch report ↗
37.3% · GPT-5.6 Sol · Terminal-Bench 4.0 · GPT-6 Astra launch report ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · DeepSWE v1.1 ↗
6 more reported results
72.7% · GPT-5.6 Sol · DeepSWE v1.1 · GPT-6 Astra launch report ↗
72.67% · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · DeepSWE · Pass@1 · % · Epoch AI · DeepSWE ↗
70.73% · GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) · DeepSWE · Pass@1 · % · Epoch AI · DeepSWE ↗
69.4% · GPT-5.6 Sol (high) · DeepSWE · Pass@1 · % · Epoch AI · DeepSWE ↗
61.06% · GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) · DeepSWE · Pass@1 · % · Epoch AI · DeepSWE ↗
45.35% · GPT-5.6 Sol (low) · DeepSWE · Pass@1 · % · Epoch AI · DeepSWE ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · ProgramBench · Accuracy ↗
1 more reported result
23.0 · GPT-5.6 Sol · ProgramBench · DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 model card ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · NL2Repo-Bench ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · Automation-Bench v1.0.6 ↗
2 more reported results
28.8% · GPT-5.6 Sol · AutomationBench · Claude Opus 5.5 launch report ↗
18.1% · GPT-5.6 Sol · AutomationBench · GPT-6 Astra launch report ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · Agents’ Last Exam ↗
1 more reported result
53.6% · GPT-5.6 Sol · Agents’ Last Exam · source scoring · GPT-6 Astra launch report ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · Apex Bench v1.1 ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · Chartography (w/tools) ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · BabyVision (w/tools) ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · ZeroBench-main (w/tools) ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · FrontierCode 1.1 Main ↗
3 more reported results
60.6% · GPT-5.6 Sol · FrontierCode 1.1 Extended · GPT-6 Astra launch report ↗
47.5% · GPT-5.6 Sol · FrontierCode 1.1 Main · GPT-6 Astra launch report ↗
47.49% · GPT-5.6 Sol (unknown thinking) · FrontierCode · Main score · % · Epoch AI · FrontierCode ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · CursorBench 4.0 ↗
5 more reported results
41.7% · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · CursorBench · Score · % · Epoch AI · CursorBench ↗
37.7% · GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) · CursorBench · Score · % · Epoch AI · CursorBench ↗
35.7% · GPT-5.6 Sol (high) · CursorBench · Score · % · Epoch AI · CursorBench ↗
31.1% · GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) · CursorBench · Score · % · Epoch AI · CursorBench ↗
24.6% · GPT-5.6 Sol (low) · CursorBench · Score · % · Epoch AI · CursorBench ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · GDPval-AA v2.1 (Elo) ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (Mini-SWE-agent) · Terminal-Bench-Science · Score ↗
2 more reported results
22.4% · GPT-5.6 Sol · Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 · Claude Opus 5.5 launch report ↗
22.4% · GPT-5.6 Sol · Terminal-Bench Science 0.1 · GPT-6 Astra launch report ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · OSWorld 2.0 · offline, partial ↗
1 more reported result
27.34% · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · OSWorld 2.0 · Binary accuracy · % · Epoch AI · OSWorld 2.0 ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · ScreenSpot-Pro · no tools ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · BenchCAD · tools ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · BrowseComp ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · AA Intelligence Index v4.1.1 · historical ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · FrontierMath Tier 4 · v2 ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · GeneBench Pro ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · MedChemBench · internal ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · LifeSciBench ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · HealthBench · HealthBench Professional · length-adjusted ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · ExploitBench · original ↗
1 more reported result
5.5% · GPT-5.6 Sol · ExploitBench · June–August 2026 · GPT-6 Astra launch report ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · ExploitGym ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · SRE Bench · Accuracy ↗
1 more reported result
55.9% · GPT-5.6 Sol · SRE-Bench · GPT-6 Astra launch report ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · SEC-Bench Pro ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · MRCR v2 · 8 needles, 256k–512k ↗
1 more reported result
73.8% · GPT-5.6 Sol · MRCR v2 · 8 needles, 512k–1M · GPT-6 Astra launch report ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · ARC-AGI-3 ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · ARC-AGI-2 ↗
5 more reported results
92.5% · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · ARC-AGI-2 · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI-2 ↗
90% · GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) · ARC-AGI-2 · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI-2 ↗
85.42% · GPT-5.6 Sol (high) · ARC-AGI-2 · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI-2 ↗
67.08% · GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) · ARC-AGI-2 · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI-2 ↗
42.5% · GPT-5.6 Sol (low) · ARC-AGI-2 · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI-2 ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · ARC-AGI-1 ↗
5 more reported results
97.5% · GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) · ARC-AGI · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI ↗
97% · GPT-5.6 Sol (high) · ARC-AGI · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI ↗
96.5% · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · ARC-AGI · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI ↗
92.5% · GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) · ARC-AGI · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI ↗
74.5% · GPT-5.6 Sol (low) · ARC-AGI · Score · % · Epoch AI · ARC-AGI ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh · ErdősBench · mean progress / 4 · Codex ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · FrontierMath-Tiers-1-3-v2-Private · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
1 more reported result
80.49% · GPT-5.6 Sol (pro, max) · FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private · Best score (across scorers) · % · Epoch AI · FrontierMath-Tier-4-v2-Private ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
1 more reported result
95.56% · GPT-5.6 Sol (low) · OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 · Best score (across scorers) · % · Epoch AI · OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · SimpleQA Verified · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (pro, max) · Chess Puzzles · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
2 more reported results
59% · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · Chess Puzzles · Best score (across scorers) · % · Epoch AI · Chess Puzzles ↗
31% · GPT-5.6 Sol (low) · Chess Puzzles · Best score (across scorers) · % · Epoch AI · Chess Puzzles ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · EBR-bench · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · Mystery Game Puzzles · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
1 more reported result
26% · GPT-5.6 Sol (low) · Mystery Game Puzzles · Best score (across scorers) · % · Epoch AI · Mystery Game Puzzles ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (high) · MirrorCode · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · Balrog · Average progress · % ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (unknown thinking) · GSO-Bench · Score OPT@1 · % ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (pro, unknown thinking) · SimpleBench · Score (AVG@5) · % ↗
3 more reported results
64.8% · GPT-5.6 Sol (unknown thinking) · SimpleBench · Score (AVG@5) · % · Epoch AI · SimpleBench ↗
71.7% · GPT-5.6 Sol (pro, xhigh) · SimpleBench · Score (AVG@5) · % · Epoch AI · SimpleBench ↗
64.8% · GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) · SimpleBench · Score (AVG@5) · % · Epoch AI · SimpleBench ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (pro, max) · WeirdML · Accuracy · % ↗
2 more reported results
88.76% · GPT-5.6 Sol (high) · WeirdML · Accuracy · % · Epoch AI · WeirdML ↗
86.97% · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · WeirdML · Accuracy · % · Epoch AI · WeirdML ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (pro, max) · APEX-Agents · Pass@1 score · % ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · PostTrainBench · Average (%) · % ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (unknown thinking) · GBAEval · Overall score · % ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) · Surface Evolver Bench · Mean score · % ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · ProofBench · Accuracy ↗
1 more reported result
83% · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · ProofBench · Accuracy · % · Epoch AI · ProofBench ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (pro, max) · LMCA · Score · % ↗
5 more reported results
58.49% · GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) · LMCA · Score · % · Epoch AI · LMCA ↗
58.43% · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · LMCA · Score · % · Epoch AI · LMCA ↗
56.94% · GPT-5.6 Sol (high) · LMCA · Score · % · Epoch AI · LMCA ↗
56.4% · GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) · LMCA · Score · % · Epoch AI · LMCA ↗
55.89% · GPT-5.6 Sol (low) · LMCA · Score · % · Epoch AI · LMCA ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (pro, max) · DTBench · Accuracy · % ↗
5 more reported results
95.73% · GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) · DTBench · Accuracy · % · Epoch AI · DTBench ↗
95.47% · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · DTBench · Accuracy · % · Epoch AI · DTBench ↗
95.47% · GPT-5.6 Sol (high) · DTBench · Accuracy · % · Epoch AI · DTBench ↗
95.2% · GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) · DTBench · Accuracy · % · Epoch AI · DTBench ↗
93.87% · GPT-5.6 Sol (low) · DTBench · Accuracy · % · Epoch AI · DTBench ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · FrontierMath-Erdos · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · Furniture Assembly · Best score (across scorers) · % ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (unknown thinking) · GDP.pdf · GDP.pdf score · % ↗
1 more reported result
30.7% · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · GDP.pdf · GDP.pdf score · % · Epoch AI · GDP.pdf ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · FrontierSWE · Score · % ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (high) · SciCode · Score · % ↗
4 more reported results
57.41% · GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) · SciCode · Score · % · Epoch AI · SciCode ↗
57.06% · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · SciCode · Score · % · Epoch AI · SciCode ↗
57.06% · GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) · SciCode · Score · % · Epoch AI · SciCode ↗
56.37% · GPT-5.6 Sol (low) · SciCode · Score · % · Epoch AI · SciCode ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) · WebDev Arena · Elo ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (unknown thinking) · Blueprint-Bench 2 · Score · % ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (high) · EnigmaEval · Accuracy · % ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) · WeirdML v3 · Max performance · % ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · General ECI · 26 October 2026 fit ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · Compression · reference-anchored score ↗
3 more reported results
0.36 reference score · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · LM training · reference-anchored score · Vals RSI Index · LM training ↗
0.18 reference score · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · Harness engineering · reference-anchored score · Vals RSI Index · Harness engineering ↗
0.00 reference score · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · Post-training · reference-anchored score · Vals RSI Index · Post-training ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · Vals Science Index · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · Vals Multimodal Index · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · Legal Research Bench · All-Pass ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · LegalBench · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark v1 · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · Tax Agent Bench · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · Finance Agent v2 · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · Excel Modeling Benchmark v1 · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · CorpFin · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · MortgageTax · Accuracy ↗
1 more reported result
74.78 % · GPT-5.6 Sol · TaxEval · Accuracy · Vals AI · TaxEval ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · MedCode · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · MedScribe · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · BioMysteryBench · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · MysteryMechanism · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · MMLU Pro · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · SAGE · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenHands) · Vibe Code Bench · original task set ↗
1 more reported result
20.01 % · GPT-5.6 Sol · Vibe Code Bench · Vibe Code Bench 1–100 · Vals AI · Vibe Code Bench 1-100 ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenHands) · SkillsBench · Score ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · IOI · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · Code Migration v1 · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (Mini-SWE-agent) · SWE-bench Verified · Score ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · LiveCodeBench · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · CyberBench · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · CUA-bench · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · Time Horizon Index: KSP · Overall ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · Public Benefits Bench · Accuracy ↗
GPT-5.6-Sol (max) · Humanity's Sixth Sense · Score ↗
gpt-5.6-sol · DistressBench · Score ↗
gpt-5.6-sol · Scale Labs · Score ↗
GPT 5.6 Sol (Codex) max · DrugDiscoveryBench · Score ↗
GPT 5.6 Sol · HiL-Bench (Human-in-Loop Benchmark) · Score ↗
gpt-5.6 (sol) · Scale Labs · Score ↗
GPT-5.6-sol (Codex) xhigh · SWE-Bench Pro V2 · full ↗
1 more reported result
82.40% · GPT-5.6 Sol (Codex) xhigh · SWE-Bench Pro V2 · hard · Scale Labs / SEAL · SWE-Bench Pro V2 ↗
gpt-5.6-sol (max) · Scale Labs · Score ↗
gpt-5.6-sol (max) · Scale Labs · Score ↗
gpt-5.6-sol · Scale Labs · Risk elicitation score ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · TasteVal · Experimental compute multiplier · October 2026 paper comparison ↗
1 more reported result
0.92 × · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · TasteVal · Normalized final-performance multiplier · October 2026 paper comparison · TasteVal: Measuring the Experimental Research Taste of AI Systems Against Human Experts ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · BoxBench · weighted rubric accuracy · OpenAI · ChatGPT financial services launch ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · Kimi Code Bench 2.0 · score · Kimi K3 · official model-card comparison ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · FrontierMath: Open Problems · FM Open Problems · first credited AI solution records · Epoch public solution registry · October 27, 2026 ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol · End-of-year balance ↗
GPT-5.6 Sol (high) · Pooled forecasting score ↗
2 more reported results
0.137 Brier scale · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · Pooled forecasting score · Epoch AI · BTF-3 · public result data ↗
0.137 Brier scale · GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) · Pooled forecasting score · Epoch AI · BTF-3 · public result data ↗
Closest models by score
Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.
43 of 58 shared benchmark comparisons
37 of 58 shared benchmark comparisons
37 of 58 shared benchmark comparisons
How similarity is measured
Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.
Reports featuring this model
Sources
Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.
- Blueprint-Bench 2 | Andon Labs ↗
- ARC Prize - Leaderboard ↗
- Arena leaderboard — WebDev evaluation ↗
- AA-AnalystAgent Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗
- CritPt Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗
- CritPt v2 Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗
- EnterpriseOps-Gym-AA Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗
- GPQA Diamond Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗
- ITBench-AA Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗
- MMMU-Pro Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗
- SciCode Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗
- 𝜏³-Banking Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗
- Terminal-Bench 2.1 Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗
- Terminal-Bench Hard Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗
- TasteVal: Measuring the Experimental Research Taste of AI Systems Against Human Experts — published result table ↗
- BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Games ↗
All 13 authors
Paglieri, Davide, Cupiał, Bartłomiej, Coward, Samuel, Piterbarg, Ulyana, Wolczyk, Maciej, Khan, Akbir, Pignatelli, Eduardo, Kuciński, Łukasz, Pinto, Lerrel, Fergus, Rob, Foerster, Jakob Nicolaus, Parker-Holder, Jack, Rocktäschel, Tim
- FrontierCode Leaderboard ↗
- DTBench — Conceptual Reasoning Index ↗
- LMCA — Conceptual Reasoning Index ↗
- Cursor · CursorBench ↗
- DeepSWE ↗
- APEX-Agents ↗
- ARC-AGI-2 ↗
- Chess Puzzles ↗
- CritPt v1 ↗
- Earthborne Rangers (EBR-bench) ↗
- FrontierMath Erdős ↗
- FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2) ↗
- FrontierMath Tiers 1-3 (v2) ↗
- Furniture Assembly Benchmark ↗
- GPQA Diamond ↗
- MirrorCode ↗
- Mystery Game Puzzles ↗
- OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 ↗
- PostTrainBench v1.1 ↗
- SimpleQA Verified ↗
- SimpleBench ↗
- Vending Bench 2 — methodology and published results ↗
- AI benchmarks & capabilities ↗
- FrontierMath: Open Problems — public problem and solution registry ↗
- FutureSearch Evals ↗
- GPT-5.6 Sol (unknown thinking) — GBA Eval ↗
- GSO: Challenging Software Optimization Tasks for Evaluating SWE-Agents ↗
- WeirdML ↗
- deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 · Hugging Face ↗
- Kimi K3: Open Frontier Intelligence — official model card ↗
- DistressBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- DrugDiscoveryBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- EnigmaEval ↗
- Scale Labs — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- HiL-Bench (Human-in-Loop Benchmark) — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Scale Labs — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Humanity's Sixth Sense — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Scale Labs — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Scale Labs — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Scale Labs — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- SWE-Bench Pro V2 — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- SWE-Bench Pro V2 — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- AI Model Benchmarks — LM Council ↗
- GPT-6 Astra: A new generation of intelligence ↗
- Introducing ChatGPT for financial services ↗
- OSWorld 2.0: Benchmarking computer-use agents on long-horizon real-world tasks ↗
- GDP.pdf Benchmark | Surge AI ↗
- Introducing Claude Opus 5.5 ↗
- FrontierSWE — software engineering benchmark ↗
- ErdősBench: research mathematics, scoped progress and proof audits ↗
- BioMysteryBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Code Migration v1 — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- CorpFin — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- CUA-bench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- CyberBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Excel Modeling Benchmark v1 — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Finance Agent v2 — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- GPQA Diamond — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Harvey's Legal Agent Benchmark v1 — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- IOI — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- LiveCodeBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- LegalBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Legal Research Bench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- MedCode — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- MedScribe — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- MMLU Pro — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- MMMU Pro — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- MortgageTax — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- MysteryMechanism — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- ProgramBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- ProofBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Public Benefits Bench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Vals RSI Index — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- SAGE — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Vals Science Index — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- SkillsBench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- SRE Bench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- SWE-bench Verified — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Tax Agent Bench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- TaxEval — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Terminal-Bench 4.0 — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Terminal-Bench-Science — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Time Horizon Index: KSP — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Vals Multimodal Index — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Vibe Code Bench 1-100 — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Vibe Code Bench — evaluation methodology and results ↗
- Surface Evolver Bench ↗
Names used in source tables
GPT 5.6 Sol · GPT 5.6 Sol (Codex) max · GPT-5.6 Sol · GPT-5.6 Sol (Codex) xhigh · GPT-5.6 Sol (Max) · GPT-5.6 Sol (Mini-SWE-agent) · GPT-5.6 Sol (OpenHands) · GPT-5.6 Sol (Xhigh) · GPT-5.6 Sol (high) · GPT-5.6 Sol (low) · GPT-5.6 Sol (max) · GPT-5.6 Sol (medium) · GPT-5.6 Sol (pro, max) · GPT-5.6 Sol (pro, unknown thinking) · GPT-5.6 Sol (pro, xhigh) · GPT-5.6 Sol (unknown thinking) · GPT-5.6 Sol (xhigh) · GPT-5.6 Sol xhigh · GPT-5.6-Sol (max) · GPT-5.6-sol (Codex) xhigh · gpt-5.6 (sol) · gpt-5.6-sol · gpt-5.6-sol (max)