Scores at a glance
1 benchmarks · large dot: R1-Distill-Qwen2.5-7BR; small dots: closest models where reported
Closest models by score
Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.
4.5 percentile-point gap1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
4.5 percentile-point gap1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
9.1 percentile-point gap1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons
How similarity is measured
Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.
Sources
Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.
- LongProc: Benchmarking Long-Context Language Models on Long Procedural Generation — published result table ↗
Xi Ye, Fangcong Yin, Yinghui He, Joie Zhang, Howard Yen, Tianyu Gao et al. · 2025
All 8 authors
Xi Ye, Fangcong Yin, Yinghui He, Joie Zhang, Howard Yen, Tianyu Gao, Greg Durrett, Danqi Chen
Names used in source tables
R1-Distill-Qwen2.5-7BR