RLTasksby ulam.ai
Models / Reported model

Reported model / MODEL EVIDENCE

text davinci 001

1 benchmarks · 1 observations · 1 sources

Scores at a glance

1 benchmarks · large dot: text davinci 001; small dots: closest models where reported

AlpacaEval ↗15.2%
15.295.3

text_davinci_001 · AlpacaEval · AlpacaEval 1 · GPT-4 judged win rate · original leaderboard example ↗

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

12.5 percentile-point gap

1 of 1 shared benchmark comparisons

How similarity is measured

Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.

Filter comparisons to this model →

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. AlpacaEval: An Automatic Evaluator of Instruction-following Models ↗

    Xuechen Li, Tianyi Zhang, Yann Dubois, Rohan Taori, Ishaan Gulrajani, Carlos Guestrin et al. · 2023

    All 8 authors

    Xuechen Li, Tianyi Zhang, Yann Dubois, Rohan Taori, Ishaan Gulrajani, Carlos Guestrin, Percy Liang, Tatsunori B. Hashimoto

Names used in source tables

text_davinci_001