Anthropic / MODEL EVIDENCE

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)

5 benchmarks · 5 observations · 5 sources · released 2025-11-24

Scores at a glance

5 benchmarks · large dot: Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning); small dots: closest models where reported

84.8689.76

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) · MMLU-Pro · AA implementation ↗

79.7991.75

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning) · LiveCodeBench · AA implementation ↗

Closest models by score

Similar positions on shared benchmark leaderboards. Smaller gaps are closer.

16.2 percentile-point gap

5 of 5 shared benchmark comparisons

GPT-5 →OpenAI
20.7 percentile-point gap

4 of 5 shared benchmark comparisons

How similarity is measured

Mean absolute gap in percentile positions on shared benchmark settings; lower is closer. At least 60% overlap is required, with a minimum of three when available. Independent evaluations are used when there are at least three; otherwise published report comparisons are used. Repeated model observations within one setting are averaged before ranking. Writing-style traits and composite indices are excluded. This describes similarity, not an overall quality ranking.

Sources

Every plotted observation links to its evaluation. Reported configurations, benchmark versions and task subsets can differ; similarity describes shared scores, not training lift.

  1. AIME 2025 Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗

    Artificial Analysis

  2. Global-MMLU-Lite Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗

    Artificial Analysis

  3. LiveCodeBench Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗

    Artificial Analysis

  4. MMLU-Pro Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗

    Artificial Analysis

  5. Terminal-Bench Hard Benchmark | Artificial Analysis ↗

    Artificial Analysis

Names used in source tables

Claude Opus 4.5 (Reasoning)