Mechanism

Replaces the reward-maximization paradigm of RLHF with finding the Nash equilibrium of a KL-regularized preference model P(y≻y′∣x)\mathcal{P}(y \succ y' \mid x) against a geometric mixture opponent policy πtmix(y∣x)∝πθt(y∣x)1−απref(y∣x)α\pi_t^{\text{mix}}(y\mid x) \propto \pi_{\theta_t}(y\mid x)^{1-\alpha}\pi_{\text{ref}}(y\mid x)^\alpha, updated via policy gradient against the pairwise preference oracle.

Practical Notes

Immune to Condorcet cycles (where A≻B≻C≻AA \succ B \succ C \succ A in human preferences breaks scalar Bradley-Terry reward models).

References

  1. Nash Learning from Human Feedback ↗

    Rémi Munos, Michal Valko, Daniele Calandriello, Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar, Mark Rowland, Zhaohan Daniel Guo et al. · 2023

    All 17 authors

    Rémi Munos, Michal Valko, Daniele Calandriello, Mohammad Gheshlaghi Azar, Mark Rowland, Zhaohan Daniel Guo, Yunhao Tang, Matthieu Geist, Thomas Mesnard, Andrea Michi, Marco Selvi, Sertan Girgin, Nikola Momchev, Olivier Bachem, Daniel J. Mankowitz, Doina Precup, Bilal Piot